Hundley Vaughan
      Of Virginia, South Carolina, and Georgia
      Submitted by Mary Gregg




      My ancestor, John Fowler, was born about 1770 in South
      Carolina (1850 census of Morgan County, Alabama) and
      died testate in Morgan County, Alabama, in the fall of 1850.
      His wife apparently had died before the time of the 1850
      census, and her name does not appear in John Fowler's will
      or in any other record so far discovered in any county in
      which he is known to have lived, i.e., Franklin and Madison
      Counties, Georgia, and Madison and Morgan Counties,
      Alabama.  I very strongly believe that she was a daughter of
      Hundley Vaughan, Sr. of Virginia, South Carolina, and
      Georgia (and perhaps also of Alabama and/or Tennessee).
      My reason for so thinking is that at least four of John
      Fowler's children had distinctive names which are widely
      thought of as "Vaughan" names; these were Aphra, Olivia,
      Melkijah and Hundley Vaughan Fowler. My Vaughan
      research has been undertaken in the hope that I can find
      proof of this theorized relationship.

      Although that hope is still unfulfilled, I have learned a good
      deal about a man named Hundley Vaughan and about his
      descendants.

         Hundley Vaughan is found in the records of Halifax
      County, Virginia, in a deed (Deed Book 10, page 128)
      which shows that on May 15, 1776, John Skates of
      Halifax County sold to Hundley Vaughan of the same
      county, 200 acres of land on branches of the south fork
      of Catawba Creek bounded by Thomas Spraggins, James
      Bates, Fleming Bates and John Royall, Witnesses were
      Jas. Bates, Sarah (X) Vaughan, Ben. Vaughan and
      Pleasant Shields.  Although it was not necessary that one
      be as old as 21 in order to make a legal deed, it is unlikely
      that a person purchasing land was less than 18 years old,
      so this purchaser, Hundley Vaughan, was almost certainly
      born not later than 1758; however, the possibility is that he
      was born as early as 1745, for, as will be  seen, he may
      have had a son, Hundley Vaughan, Jr., who likely was born
      about 1765.

         But this Halifax County appearance is not the earliest
      record of Hundley Vaughan in Virginia.  In Ruth and
      Sam Sparacio's Order Book Abstracts of Caroline
      County, Virginia, 1772-1773, are two abstracts which I
      believe refer to the man found in Halifax County in 1776.
      In Caroline County Order Book 10, page 109, there is
      mentioned that at a Court held September 10, 1772,
      James Miller, plaintiff, sued Mundley (sic) Vaughn,
      defendant. Although the abstract does not so state, the
      suit was apparently carried over until the next day, and
      in the same Order Book, on pages 118 and 119, under
      date of September 11, 1772, it is again mentioned, this
      time the name of the defendant being given in the abstract
      as Hundley (sic) Baughan.

      [Baughan was a not uncommon variant of the name Vaughan and, in fact, there
      was a familyin Caroline County whose name was most often spelled Baughan rather
      than Vaughan, though which spelling was "correct," I cannot say,]

         Probable relatives of Hundley Vaughan in Halifax
      County include the Ben. and Sarah Vaughan who
      witnessed the deed when Hundley bought his land from
      John Skates, and the William Vaughan who signed his
      will (by mark) in Halifax County, Virginia, September
      4. 1777, (Halifax County Will Book 1, page 199)
      Among other legatees was William's daughter, Milesend
      Bates (whose husband possibly was Samuel Bates, one
      of the nominated executors of the will), and the will was
      witnessed by Jas.  Bates, William Bates and Mary (+)
      Bates.  Since both William Vaughan and Hundley
      Vaughan were associated with members of the Bates
      family, it seems reasonable to suppose that William and
      Hundley were related to each other.

         Another link between William Vaughan and the Hundley
      Vaughan family is the Spragins family, who were near
      neighbors of the Vaughans on Catawba Creek in Halifax
      County, Virginia.  An indication of a William Vaughan-
      Spragins relationship is the name of one of William
      Vaughan's daughters, Maacah.  By tradition, this very
      unusual name was first an "Abney name" and then it
      became a "Spragins name" when, in about 1747, Thomas
      Spragins married Maacah Abney. Evidence of a Vaughan-
      Spragins relationship is that there was a man named
      Melkijah Spragins Vaughan who bought some land in
      Louisiana in the 1800s.  I believe he very likelywas the
      same man, Melkijah S. Vaughan, who later lived and
      died in Wilson County, Tennessee, buteven if that theory
      is incorrect, the mere existence of Melkijah Spraggins
      Vaughan is indicative of a probableSpraggins-Vaughan
      kinship.

         On September 19, 1777 Hunley Vaughan of Halifax
      sold to Thomas Spragins of same, 200acres on the south
      fork of Catawba Creek bounded by Thomas Spragins,
      James Bates, Fleming Bates and John Royall, Witnesses
      were William Shiels, Reuben Abney and William Shields,
      Jr.  (Halifax DB 10:400)

         Although apparently no longer a landowner, Hundley
      Vaughan was still in Halifax County as late as May 1779,
      for on that date, under a program of the Continental
      Congress aimed atdefeating the efforts of counterfeiters,
      Hundley Vaughan of Halifax County exchanged 38
      (pounds?) in paper money for a like amount of another
      issue.  No subsequent record of him in Halifax County
      has been found.

         We next hear of him on February 6. 1782, when William
      Atkinson, Senr., of Pittsylvania County, Virginia (immediately
      west of Halifax) sold to Hundley Vaughan "of said county".
      50 acres in Pittsylvania County on the north side of Pigg
      River bounded by George Hearndon, Daniel Witcher and
      John Witcher.  Witnesses were Georg (X) Pike, William
      Shiels, and one other whose name I could not read.
      (Pittsylvania Deed Book 6:220) Just twodays later, on
      February 8, 1782, Hundley Vaughan, whose wife Elizabeth relinquished her dower rights, sold this land to Harman
      Cook, also of Pittsylvania County, Witnesses were Saml.
      Call and, Henry Conway and one illegible, which appeared
      to me to be the same as the illegible name on the earlier
      deed. (Pittsylvania Deed Book 6:238) Hundley apparently
      never again owned any land in Virginia, though he did
      continue to live in Pittsylvania County at least until 1785,
      for he appears on the 1782 and 1785 tax lists for
      Pittsylvania.   I have not seen the 1786 taxlist, but I have
      checked the 1787 Pittsylvania and Halifax lists, and he
      appears on neither, so he must have gone to South
      Carolina between 1785 and 1787.

         Hundley Vaughn appears in the 1790 census of Union
      County, South Carolina, with two free white males above
      the age of 16, four free white males below the age of 16,
      and four white females.  This is the only trace of Hundley
      Vaughan in the SouthCarolina records, No instance of
      his having bought land or in any way participated in the
      public lifeof the county has come to light.  He is not in
      the1800 census of South Carolina, having already moved
      on to Franklin County, Georgia.

         It should be noted that there is no proof that Hundley
      Vaugh(a)n of Pittsylvania County, Virginia, is the same
      as Hundley Vaugh(a)n of Halifax County, Virginia; or
      that the man in Union County, South Carolina, is Hundley
      of Pittsylvania and/or Halifax; or that the Hundley Vaughn
      of Franklin County, Georgia, is the same as Hundley
      Vaughan of Union County, South Carolina; or that
      Hundley Vaughan of Madison County, Mississippi
      Territory is the person found in Franklin County, Georgia.
      I do, however, believe that all these instances of the name
      Hundley Vaughan represent two-and only two-men, who
      were probably father and son, though it is possible that
      Hundley Vaughan, Jr. was the son of a brother of Hundley
      Vaughan, Sr.

         There are several mentions of Hundley Vaughan in the
      records of Franklin County, Georgia:

          In They Were Here, Volume 8, No, 3 & 4, there is
      a record entitled "Pay Roll of a Detachment of Militia
      Infantry and Spies under command of Lt, William
      Lawrence, garrisoned at Fort Irvin into service of the
      United States by order of His Excellency Gov.  Jared
      Irwin.,."  Among those listed was "Hundley Vaughn,
      Spy, May 15, 1796, 2 mo. 6 days".  Part of this same
      payroll issubtitled "Privates serving from 47 to 80
      days" and the name William Vaughn appears on this
      list.  A request to the National Archives for pension,
      military or bounty land record relating to this service
      for Hundley Vaughn brought negative results.

         Hundley Vaughn appears on the tax lists (though
      not as a landowner) of Franklin County for the years
      1800, 1801, 1805 and 1806, His name does not appear
      on subsequent tax lists, but he was still in Franklin
      County, or he returned there, as is proved by later
      records.

         One Hundley Vaughn of Franklin County participated
      in the 1805 Georgia Land Lottery,which means that he
      had lived in Georgia for at least three years, Others who
      registered from Franklin County were Benjamin,
      Littleberry and William Vaughan and George and
      William Vaughn.  (Benjamin Vaughan and William
      Vaughn were fortunate drawers.) Of these, William
      Vaughn and George Vaughn were father and son, and
      while they might have been related to Hundley, Littleberry,
      Benjamin and William Vaughan, they seem not to have
      been part of the immediate family.

         On January 31, 1806, Hundley Vaughn witnessed
      the deed in which Benjamin Vaughn bought land in
      Franklin County from James Gates, and when the
      deed was proved the Clerk wrote that it was sworn
      to by Hundley Vaughn, Sr. (Franklin DB PP:7-8).
      This is the only indication we have that in this time
      period there existed simultaneously, in one
      geographical area, two men named Hundley Vaughn.

         In a deed made in Franklin County on May 17,
      1808, and recorded in Jasper County, Georgia,
      Deed Book 1, page 134, Handley Vaughn is seen
      witnessing the sale of land from Fleming and
      Martha Jordan to Wylly Rogers.

         In 1811, Madison County, Georgia, was created
      partly from Franklin County, and it is probable that
      Hundley Vaughn and his relatives fell into this new
      county, Records of Madison County have not yet
      been thoroughly searched.

         Even if the Vaughans did live for a while in
      Madison County, Georgia, it can have been for only
      a short time, for they soon began to appear in the
      records of Madison County, Alabama (Mississippi
      Territory).  The earliest record I have for any member
      of the family in Alabama is when, on November 27,
      1812, William and Manoah Vaughan of Madison
      County, Alabama, bought the southwest quarter of
      section 21, township 3. range 2 east, in Madison
      County.

         From 1798 until 1817, Alabama was part of the
      Mississippi Territory, and an 1813 tax listof Madison
      County, Mississippi Territory, shows Benjamin, Hanley,
      Littleberry, Manoah and William Vaughan paying taxes
      there that year; Manoah and William still are listed there
      in 1814, I think we can be certain that "Hanley" Vaughan
      was actually Hundley Vaughan, but there is no way to
      know whether this was Hundley, Jr. or Hundley, Sr.  I
      am inclined to believe, however, that it wasHundley, Jr.
      Hundley, Sr., were he alive, would have been nearing
      70 years of age, and although I do not know what the
      law was in the MississippiTerritory, in most jurisdictions
      a man that old would not have appeared on a tax list,
      being exempt from taxation because of age.

         With that 1813 tax list appearance, Hundley Vaughan
      vanishes, never to be found again. It is quite possible that,
      as a descendant wrote in 1915, he removed to the area
      near Nashville, Tennessee, and died there, though no
      record of his name has been found in Davidson or
      nearby Tennessee counties.  Early deed records of
      Davidson County, Tennessee, should be searched, and
      so should the early Davidson County Court Minutes if
      they exist.

         Others of the family stayed in the northern Alabama
      area, and several of them served in theWar of 1812
      from that area.  On a list of persons serving in the 6th
      Regiment of Mississippi Militia (1814-1815) are the
      names of privatesBenjamin Vaughn, Melkijah Vaughn,
      Minoah Vaughn and William Vaughn, Some of these
      will be taken up in later papers.  Here, I will say only
      that no genealogically useful information (either military
      records or pension or bounty land applications) on these
      soldiers has been found in the National Archives.

         As has been seen, the only proof I have for my theory
      that there existed, in the lateeighteenth century, a Hundley
      Vaughan, Sr. and a Hundley Vaughan, Jr. is the mention
      by the Clerk in Franklin County, Georgia, that the deed
      was witnessed by Hundley Vaughan, Sr.; but it seems to
      me that the names of John Fowler'schildren (Aphra,
      Melkijah, Olivia and Hundley Vaughan Fowler) are very
      strong circumstantial evidence that John Fowler's wife
      was a member of Hundley Vaughan's family, and other
      factors make it probable that she was the daughter of a
      Hundley Vaughan, Sr. (Which statement implies, of
      course, that there existed a Hundley Vaughan,Jr.) These
      factors are:

         1. John Fowler's daughter Aphra probably was his
      oldest child; she was born about 1796(1850 census of
      Marshall County, Mississippi) so her mother must have
      been born not later than about 1781, and most likely
      was born several years earlier than that; therefore,
      her maternal grandfather (i.e., Aphra's mother's father)
      must have been born not later than about 1760.  Of the
      Hundley Vaughans we have found so far, only the one
      who was an adult by 1772 would fit to have been the
      father of Aprha Fowler's mother.

         2. The 1772 Hundley Vaughan was not the only
      eighteenth century man of that name of whom we have
      knowledge.  Our information on the other Hundley
      Vaughan comes from a letter written in 1915 by his great-great-granddaughter, Mrs. Mary Elizabeth
      (Vaughan) James, of Shannon, Mississippi. She wrote
      that her great-great-grandfather Hunley Vaughan was
      father of Billy, Melkyah, Abner,Manoah, Littleberry,
      Benjamin, Hunley and Sallie Vaughan. Research has
      shown that these children were born from the mid-1780s
      through the early 1800s, which may be an indication that
      their father probably was born about 1765 and was,
      herefore, born too late for him to have been the adult in
      Caroline County in 1772.
         Mrs, James stated that Sallie, the only daughter of her great-great-grandfather HunleyVaughan, died "in early
      youth".  If she was correct in so stating, then obviously,
      this Hunley Vaughan was not the father of John Fowler's
      wife.  If I am correct in theorizing that John Fowler's
      father-in-law was named Hundley Vaughan, we must,
      then, have had two Hundley Vaughans who were living
      adults in the latter part of the eighteenth century,

         3. It is clear that Mrs, James's great-great-grandfather
      Hunley Vaughan, was the younger of the two men of that
      name and time. In the 1790 census, Hundley Vaughan
      of Union County, South Carolina, had, besides himself,
      one other maleover the age of 16, four males under 16,
      and four females.  If this was a "typical" household,
      then it consisted of Hundley and his wife, Elizabeth, a
      son born 1774 or earlier, four sons born between 1774
      and 1790, and three daughters. This does not fit to have
      been the household of the Hunley Vaughan of whom Mrs.
      James wrote; her Hunley could not have had eight children
      born before 1790 since his apparent oldest child, Littleberry,
      was born in the mid-1780s. This must, therefore, have been
      the household of Hundley Vaughan, Sr.

         I believe I have now shown that there is good reason to
      believe that John Fowler married adaughter of the Hundley
      Vaughan who went from Virginia to Union County, South
      Carolina, and from there to Franklin County, Georgia. I
      have also shown that it is highly probable that there were
      two late eighteenth century men named Hundley Vaughan,
      and that it was the older of these two who fits to have been
      John Fowler's father-in-law, with the younger of the two
      having been Mary Elizabeth (Vaughan) James's great-great-grandfather.

         Over the years, I have corresponded with a number of
      Hundley Vaughan's descendants who have done research
      on their own lines, and have generously shared their
      information. I, myself, have done very little research on
      the families of William Vaughan of Lafayette County,
      Mississippi, (including his descendants in Texas), or of
      Littleberry Vaughan.  Most of the information on these
      families given below is fromthe correspondents mentioned
      above.  I do not know who the other children (besides
      Hundley, Jr. and (possibly) Mrs. John Fowler) of Hundley Vaughan,Sr. were, but I believe that the William Vaughan,
      aged 75, born in Virginia, (also known as "William H.
      Vaughan"), of the 1850 Lafayette County, Mississippi,
      census, was one of the sons and I shall list him as such,
      but the reader should keep in mind that this is an unproven
      theory of mine, and differs from the opinions of most of
      those who have researched this family.
       



      Any questions, suggestions, corrections, and/or additional
      information contact me, Linda CONAWAY Welden at:

      Linda_Welden@vaughan-vaughn.org

      BACK to Mary Gregg's Index

      BACK to the VAUGHAN VAUGHN RESOURCE Page



      Copyright Information and Restrictions:
      Information from the VAUGHAN-VAUGHN RESOURCE PAGES
      hasbeen provided for the free use of those engaged in non-commercial
      genealogical research by our Vaughan-Vaughn Discussion Group and many other souces.
      Any and all commercial use is strictly prohibited.
      Permission is Not Granted to copy any Vaughan-Vaughn Discussions Group
      and/or RESOURCE Page files to other electronic locations
      whether web pages or list postings